When Brakel writes about a "complete national conversion," he uses great words. That is why we must ask precisely what he means.

Not every individual without exception

Brakel makes clear that "all Israel" is, according to him, a national designation. He expects a very broad, recognisable turning of the Jewish nation to the Messiah. That does not mean that every single person of Jewish descent is automatically born again.

That limitation fits his earlier covenant doctrine: bodily or national relationship and personal faith may not be made identical.

Why he reads Romans 11 this way

The sequence in Paul's argument is decisive for Brakel. A partial hardening has come over Israel "until" the fulness of the Gentiles comes in. Then follows "and so all Israel shall be saved" and a reference to the Deliverer out of Zion.

Brakel does not want to let "Israel" in this part of the sentence suddenly switch to a completely different referent without textual necessity. The same nation of which hardening is described is, according to him, the nation of which future turning is expected.

Beloved for the fathers' sake

Romans 11:28–29 thereby receives special meaning. Enmity with regard to the Gospel and being beloved for the fathers' sake stand side by side. The gifts and calling of God are called irrevocable. Brakel hears in that no cheap acquittal of unbelief, but indeed a boundary against definitive writing-off.

Covenant faithfulness as bearing ground

This passage explains why Brakel does not treat his expectation of Israel as a loose end-times topic. It hangs together with his doctrine of God's unchangeableness. What God promised to Abraham and his seed forms for him a reason to expect a future.

Scripture test: the core question is whether Paul with "all Israel" indeed means a future national movement. Brakel says yes. In this series we present that faithfully first; after that the text itself remains the norm.

Brakel then stacks texts

After Romans 11 he is not finished. He goes to 2 Corinthians 3, words of Yeshua and various prophets. With this he tries to show that his expectation does not rest on one difficult formulation.